Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Paul Crowley 7. kol
There's no fire alarm for artificial general intelligence, so if you're not alarmed by this, nothing will alarm you until it is much, much too late.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Roko Mijic 8. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ciphergoth
Having talked to some AI people here on twitter I think I can see what the problem is. AI people are dismissive of safety concerns for two reasons: (1) they correctly see lots of BS hype about it in the popular media. Most of them haven't actually engaged with serious (1/n)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alexander Kruel
I predict that less than 5% of the relevant experts will change their mind after reading the AI risk literature.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Paul Crowley 8. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @XiXiDu @RokoMijicUK
This seems right; people largely don't change their minds. But I'd predict that someone in the field who didn't have a set opinion about it would be much more likely to take the field seriously after watching eg Nate Soares's Google talk.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alexander Kruel 8. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ciphergoth @RokoMijicUK
You got a link to the talk? I will try to get some people to watch it and ask for feedback.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Roko Mijic 8. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @XiXiDu @ciphergoth
Maybe, but there might be a bit of a hysteresis effect here. Exposure to carefully reasoned thinking first is probably more effective than stupid AGI-on-your-cornflakes hype and then the careful stuff playing catch-up.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"