Twitter | Search | |
Techno Fog
It's bad enough that Judge Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the case against Flynn. It's even worse that his decision was influenced by a WaPo opinion column written by David O'Neil. O'Neil is the lawyer for Sally Yates - who witnessed/participated in the effort to oust Flynn.
Reply Retweet Like More
Techno Fog May 20
Replying to @hiattf
Of course, the Washington Post fails to inform its readers that David O'Neil represents Sally Yates. Sure seems like he's helping advance his client's interests. Perhaps WaPo Editorial Page Editor can explain the omission?
Reply Retweet Like
Techno Fog May 20
Replying to @Techno_Fog
To summarize the circus: Gleeson and O'Neil are in the same firm. O'Neil represents Yates - who faces serious allegations of misconduct w/r/t Flynn. Gleeson and O'Neil ask the Court to exceed its authority and sentence Flynn. Gleeson gets appointed amicus. 🤡🤡🤡
Reply Retweet Like
Fact Checker of Xi's Puppets May 20
Replying to @Techno_Fog
At this point, Sullivan is a fact witness to a half dozen irregularities that need to be looked at
Reply Retweet Like
Derplestiltzkin May 20
Deprivation of rights under color of law looking more likely. Particularly 6th amendment with the stall tactics he's played for years. Speedy trial my ass.
Reply Retweet Like
🐸Roarie🦁 May 20
Replying to @Techno_Fog
Reply Retweet Like
𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚊 ⭐⭐⭐ Text Trump 88022 May 20
Yep.
Reply Retweet Like
francvs May 20
Please unroll .
Reply Retweet Like
Thread Reader App May 20
Replying to @francvs @Techno_Fog
Hi, you can read it here: : It's bad enough that Judge Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the case against Flynn. It's even worse that… Talk to you soon. 🤖
Reply Retweet Like
Paulitically Incorrect May 20
Replying to @Techno_Fog
Also, note that the Obama “leak” specifically mentioned perjury days ahead of Sullivan.
Reply Retweet Like
cai kelly May 21
That was the dog whistle.....
Reply Retweet Like