|
@Stanford | |||||
|
Conservatively, 25% of growth in U.S. GDP between 1960 and 2010 can be attributed to greater gender and racial balance in the workplace, @StanfordGSB research finds. The number could be as high as 40%. stanford.io/38Dv8wS
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Warren Vidovich
@orgbd
|
25. sij |
|
At what cost? Suppression of total wages and forcing American households from single income to dual income with no measurable net change in wealth per household. Increasing the supply of workers does not increase wages. Only productivity which doesn’t put meals on the table.
|
||
|
||
|
Shubham
@RealShubhamGarg
|
24. sij |
|
Interesting. I got a question is this is also based on occupational inequality i.e. more males in higher salary industries?
|
||
|
|
||
|
CaliLili™🧜🏾🧜🏼♀️🧜🏽♀️🏄🏼♀️🏄🏾♀️🦀🎬🎼🏝️
@CaliLiliIndies
|
30. sij |
|
#UniversityStrike4Democracy
#ShesWorthIt🗽
'broadcast live
every state in the union
come
some announcement
from a
powerful lobby
televised
satelized
anticipated
hypothesized
groupO'people
b surprised
#GetAVoice
In a World
runnin' on a PacOfLies'©
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
|
||
|
|
||
|
vance hanna
@the_vance_hanna
|
1. velj |
|
Without a doubt! Thanks
|
||
|
|
||