| | |
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookie Use and Data Transfer outside the EU. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
Edward Snowden
Wow. This explicitly authorizes to get journalists' call records to uncover sources--without court oversight.
Paulius Litvaitis Jun 30
What's the point of the 4th amendment at this point. ..
Dave Glover Jun 30
shouldn't come as any surprise to You Edward
Sean Barrett Jun 30
Doesn't 'There is an extra step under the rules if the NSL targets journalist in order “to identify [...] sources.”' say opposite?
Carl Hoffman Jun 30
ᏰᎡᎽᎦᎾN ᎡᎥᎠᏋᎡ Jun 30
Sean Barrett Jun 30
I may not be parsing it right, as the wording and case-by-case breakdown is pretty disorganized.
Anonymous Jun 30
<3 <3;-}><3 Read This Brother. <3;-}><3 Never :-)
Andrey Antonov Jun 30
Edward, if possible - come to us, in the Apple Museum. All the equipment is working. 1976-2006 :) ()
Jerel Damon Jun 30
How are they rules if they're secret? Journalist thrive on making secrets exposed.
chuck madden Jun 30
It's getting hard to see through the fog of all the promised transparency.
Osman Ali Jun 30
Poppsikle Jun 30
The Intercept is Establishment, they are not targeted.
Edward Snowden Jun 30
The justification for classifying the FBI's rules for copying journo-source comms appears to have been avoiding criticism. No natsec basis.
Tim Farley Jun 30
When will be indicted?
Omer Bashir Jun 30
Ben Rosengart Jun 30
jobsec
Edward Snowden Jun 30
More on 's scoop on the FBI's abuse of NSL authorities to uncover journo's sources:
Melissa Φιλοραφαία Jun 30