| | |
Edward Snowden
Wow. This explicitly authorizes to get journalists' call records to uncover sources--without court oversight.
Paulius Litvaitis 30 jun.
What's the point of the 4th amendment at this point. ..
Dave Glover 30 jun.
shouldn't come as any surprise to You Edward
Sean Barrett 30 jun.
Doesn't 'There is an extra step under the rules if the NSL targets journalist in order “to identify [...] sources.”' say opposite?
Carl Hoffman 30 jun.
ᏰᎡᎽᎦᎾN ᎡᎥᎠᏋᎡ 30 jun.
Sean Barrett 30 jun.
I may not be parsing it right, as the wording and case-by-case breakdown is pretty disorganized.
Anonymous 30 jun.
<3 <3;-}><3 Read This Brother. <3;-}><3 Never :-)
Andrey Antonov 30 jun.
Edward, if possible - come to us, in the Apple Museum. All the equipment is working. 1976-2006 :) ()
Jerel Damon 30 jun.
How are they rules if they're secret? Journalist thrive on making secrets exposed.
chuck madden 30 jun.
It's getting hard to see through the fog of all the promised transparency.
Osman Ali 30 jun.
Poppsikle 30 jun.
The Intercept is Establishment, they are not targeted.
Edward Snowden 30 jun.
The justification for classifying the FBI's rules for copying journo-source comms appears to have been avoiding criticism. No natsec basis.
Tim Farley 30 jun.
When will be indicted?
Omer Bashir 30 jun.
Ben Rosengart 30 jun.
jobsec
Edward Snowden 30 jun.
More on 's scoop on the FBI's abuse of NSL authorities to uncover journo's sources:
Melissa Φιλοραφαία 30 jun.