| | |
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookie Use and Data Transfer outside the EU. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
Edward Snowden
Skeptical? I once believed NSA wouldn't ignore constitutional complaints. Then I heard this: (CC: )
Carlotta Jun 5
sad isn't it?
Chase Roberts Jun 5
Steffen Christensen Jun 5
I am beyond skepticism.
Albert Nikanorov Jun 5
BücketHeâd Jun 5
his eye movement does not portend honest communication
Johnny Profane Jun 5
Sad? No. Sad is when cute little kitty dies. Horrifying.
Pierre Asselin Jun 5
That annihilates E. Holder's claim that normal channels were available to whistleblower, even under a diff. admin
Andy Valeri Jun 5
Funny that they're so interested in listening to everyone's conversations yet don't want to listen to *that* one
Martin Nicholls Jun 5
lol RIP Privacy Shield
CouchRambo Jun 5
Anyone have a source on this? What does "read into the program" mean?
kevin Jun 5
okay, I get it, they abhor the constitution so many have died for but what exactly is theirs? That's what we need.
Virginia Hoge Jun 5
I'm skeptical of you and I am sad that he > sold out.
Four Corners Media Jun 5
history will judge Obama, pardon and
Thomas Drake Jun 5
source is a PBS Frontline doc called United States of Secrets. Access to ref'd mass surveillance program very limited
KuroNetwork Jun 5
compartmentalization, you have to read into programs to have access to the info or even talk about it.
Jerel Damon Jun 5
It's like they believe the "wrong thing" is the "right thing" to do as long as no one knows of it's existence.
(((Brian Moon))) Jun 5
Wow. Even more fascinating is all the hedging he does ("if that's what he said, then I would have…") Just, wow.
Carlos Polanco Jun 5
You're an expert now? People get nervous when they are telling the truth more than when they are lying.