| | |
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookie Use and Data Transfer outside the EU. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
Edward Snowden
Today said, “There is a path for whistle-blowers to take if they have legitimate concerns.” Fact check:
The Long Read: Long before Edward Snowden went public, John Crane was a top Pentagon official fighting to protect NSA whistleblowers. Instead their lives were ruined – and so was his
The Guardian The Guardian @guardian
President Obama May 31
well done Snowden , proud of you 👍👍
Bricks&Bullets May 31
President Obama May 31
President Obama May 31
Jerel Damon May 31
Like a screening? So you can sanitize what they are whistleblowing? Defeating the purpose.
President Obama May 31
♪ ♫♪ ♫ ♩ ️☮ May 31
You could have taken a path to whistle-blowing, except your data would have been buried and your life ruined.
Rob Waldeck May 31
its true. There is a path. Just not to OSC or MSPB. I do these cases
John Doe May 31
it's grossly inadequate to support main responsibility to protect the peoples rights 😠
aj May 31
and how many cases resulting in the murder or silencing or the whistleblower?
Rob Waldeck May 31
zero. Never seen it. They might get fired.
aj May 31
so you're saying the government hasn't silenced or threatened any whistle blowers?
Rob Waldeck May 31
haven't seen it in my practice. They do make it illegal to disclose classified info.
Beata Samson May 31
U can't expect the whistle-blowers to be taken seriously if they're in Moscow
Beata Samson May 31
1/ But yes, we the people of Europe did a mistake
Beata Samson May 31
2/ We should have given U the asylum and not allow U to end up in Russia. It was stupid.
Casey May 31
Casey May 31
- the Whitehouse is now the playhouse for naughty little boys