| | |
Edward Snowden
Statistically speaking, reassigning traffic cops to surveillance will likely cost lives, even it catches criminals:
Tom the Dancing Bug 10 mei
That's not how our brains operate.
Patrick Gray 10 mei
You think Belgium is doing the wrong thing by reassigning police to CT? Gotta say. that seems a tad silly in light of recent events
Peter VanValkenburgh 10 mei
keith•j•grant 10 mei
I don’t disagree w/ the sentiment, but statistically speaking, need to prove causation
Forager Funds 10 mei
Are you using 32 fatalities as the 'opportunity cost'. Don't forget - these clowns were targeting nuclear facilities too
私Gaeelは、リールーに存在する 10 mei
The difference between useful policy, and policy that feels satisfying to an easily excitable public
Tim Schofield 10 mei
Which task is saving more lives?
Sᴀsᴄʜᴀ 10 mei
.. even more so if alcohol, testosterone and football are involved:
Patrick Gray 10 mei
That's not how law enforcement works. You don't assign resources purely on which saves more lives today/tomorrow
Tim Schofield 10 mei
Surely it should if it brings the greater good?
dobrado 10 mei
In Brasil Military Police is deadlier than Traffic. :/
Patrick Gray 10 mei
If they don't invest in CT now there will be more attacks, and knows that.
Helge Fahrnberger 10 mei
Excuse me Mr , there are around 800 traffic deaths per year in Belgium, not 60,000.
DocteurMathieu 10 mei
no cops will be « reassigned ». they will be fired, and some AI will do the surveillance.
Philaeus 10 mei
wo steht das denn? 60.000 Casualties, nicht Fatalities (siehe Chart)
Ian Hamlett 10 mei
It's not about the number of people directly affected, it's having a terrorist's values upheld by fear of what they might do.
Andreas Paschek 10 mei
accidents n.e. casualties n.e. fatalities!
Helge Fahrnberger 10 mei
"Casualty" can mean fatality in English. See red underlined numbers = that suggests correlation.