Twitter | Search | |
Sen. Patrick Leahy
BREAKING: Kavanaugh testified he never received any docs that even “appeared to … have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff.” Well, he got 8 pages of material taken VERBATIM from my files, obviously written by Dem staff, LABELED “not [for] distribution”.
Reply Retweet Like More
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Here’s more of that email stolen from Dem staff that was clearly marked “not [for] distribution”.
Reply Retweet Like
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Kavanaugh was told that I received a sensitive letter “in the strictest confidence” about a controversial nominee. He was asked to keep the information confidential and to take no action without further instruction. HE DIDN’T THINK THIS WAS “untoward”?
Reply Retweet Like
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Kavanaugh sent an email to a WH colleague with information he got from Mr. Miranda. It was vote information on 15 Democratic senators, on a contentious issue, according to “Democrat sources.” STILL no reason to suspect anything “untoward”?
Reply Retweet Like
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Here are more emails. It is simply not ‘normal’ to get real-time insider intelligence from a Democratic “mole” and marked “spying.” Red flags abound. And with 102,000 documents withheld by the Trump WH, mostly about judicial noms, we can bet there’s more.
Reply Retweet Like
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Bottom line: You don’t get inside intel about what Democratic senators are thinking, what confidential letters they’re receiving, & what their staff is advising, MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” without knowing something was DEEPLY WRONG.
Reply Retweet Like
Sen. Patrick Leahy Sep 6
Replying to @SenatorLeahy
Judge Kavanaugh answered under oath more than 100 questions on this hacking in 2004 and 2006. His repeated denials that he didn’t receive any stolen info and didn’t suspect anything “untoward” is SIMPLY NOT CREDIBLE.
Reply Retweet Like