Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Sam Young Lab
From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing | Molecular Biology of the Cell We need to make a stand THANK YOU Peter Walter and Dyche Mullins Response 2 is now my go to!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Serena Dudek 6. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MarinaP63 i 4 ostali
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
American Genetic Association 9. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 3 ostali
'By comparison, the profits generated by university presses and society journals are modest, and they often support valuable initiatives that enrich our community.' 'Nuff said.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Free Our Knowledge 8. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @NoFee_Science i 4 ostali
We are making a stand. Join us.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Atul Butte 10. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 3 ostali
Yup. We’re there.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
The REAL MillerFinch 10. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 3 ostali
Excellent analysis of the current state of science publishing. It must change! Even as a consumer, I’m not willing to pay $35 to read a paper! Especially when my tax dollars paid for the research. 🤬
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Orin, maidanez égaré 8. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 4 ostali
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sara DegliEsposti 17. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 6 ostali
"the industry made more than $10 billion in 2015, with profits for the largest players, such as Elsevier, Springer, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley, exceeding 30%" publishing
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alexei Kirillov 9. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 3 ostali
The NIH and NSF could start running their own not-for-profit publishing houses.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alexei Kirillov 9. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamYoungLab @MullinsLab i 4 ostali
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"