|
@RyanMaue | |||||
|
Factually wrong. Not even in ballpark from @MichaelEMann & fanboy @chriscmooney 11°C anomaly?
washingtonpost.com/news/energy-en… pic.twitter.com/8xO7eoaZUl
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Ryan Maue
@RyanMaue
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@joelgombiner air-sea fluxes depend on air-sea temperature difference. Also, for frontal circulations/fluxes, it's gradient of SST
|
||
|
|
Ryan Maue
@RyanMaue
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@joelgombiner it's the Gulf Stream -- it meanders, it's always there but in slightly different location ... anomalies are always large +/-
|
||
|
|
Ryan Maue
@RyanMaue
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@joelgombiner need to look at map of air-sea fluxes ... can't say anything about cyclogenesis by only looking at one term of nonlinear eq.
|
||
|
manzo wilder
@ottawavalleywx
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@RyanMaue @MichaelEMann @chriscmooney looks to be 4-5 C at the most in a few areas, models.weatherbell.com/sst/e_us_coast…
|
||
|
Trev - PeterboroughWeatherWatch@peterborweather
@peterborweather
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@RyanMaue @MichaelEMann @chriscmooney does that piece say 11.5C(21f)? .since when does 11.5°C convert to 21°f ?...it would be more than 52°f
|
||
|
Aaron Funk
@aaronbfunk
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@peterborweather @RyanMaue It's a difference so scale by 9/5 to get delta in F. Supposed to be 11.5F perhaps?
|
||
|
|
Trev - PeterboroughWeatherWatch@peterborweather
@peterborweather
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@BTSullivan91 @RyanMaue @MichaelEMann @chriscmooney Thanks for that clarification :).we are all still agreed though,11.5C is not the anomaly
|
||
|
Michael E. Mann
@MichaelEMann
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@joelgombiner @chriscmooney See: twitter.com/MichaelEMann/s…, There is *small* region w/ 11+C SST anomalies. Most are about +5C, still very warm
|
||
|
Mark Cowan
@1stFITNESSMC
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
T-Bone
@tarno80
|
10 Feb 15 |
|
@RyanMaue @TedKeller @MichaelEMann @chriscmooney This the grand finale of the Tree Ring Circus or will the jokes keep coming? Or will u sue?
|
||