Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Roger Pielke Jr. 3. sij
Honestly I’m flattered that these guys see my work as so important that they feel like have to make a cartoon to willfully misrepresent it 🙏 I might use this cartoon in the sequel! The actual book with the actual arguments —>
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Roger Pielke Jr.
The cartoon reminds me of the notion of “predistortion” of science in politics advocated by one congressman His example: If you know the true answer is 0 but also know that your political opponent will claim it’s -5, perhaps you should (falsely) claim it’s +5 This is OK, right?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
George Everding 3. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RogerPielkeJr
Landscape prof at architecture school told us in his practice he would design the appropriate number of trees, then take half of them off the drawing he presented to the planning commission, because they always would ask for twice what he showed them.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Toons Mag 3. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RogerPielkeJr
Like it! We would like to invite you to visit our cartoons.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Willis Eschenbach 3. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RogerPielkeJr
John Cook. Say no more. w.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"