Twitter | Search | |
Thomas Massie
I’d fire him. I listened to his testimony in the SCIF. He’s a leaker, not a whistleblower. Vindman was upset that didn’t follow the script Vindman prepared for the phone call. Current Commander in Chief doesn’t take orders from a Lt. Col.!
The White House is reportedly weighing options to dismiss Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the National Security Council (NSC) after he gave testimony last year during President Donald Trump's...
Fox News Fox News @FoxNews
Reply Retweet Like More
Juris Imprudent Feb 7
I watched his entire testimony. I've rarely seen someone more willing to put his career and reputation on the line simply to speak the truth. This vengeful reaction by Republicans is disgusting.
Reply Retweet Like
Thomas Massie Feb 7
Just to clarify, you watched his public testimony, but not his testimony in the SCIF.
Reply Retweet Like
Sharon_Indiana Feb 7
I'd fire his brother too. They were in front of the Capital laughing about all this. Posing for pictures. I would clear out a lot of these leakers. We know there are more.
Reply Retweet Like
Christie Slough Feb 8
He did fire the brother also
Reply Retweet Like
Todd C. Allen Feb 7
He should receive a Court Martial. Even a Private understands the Chain of Command which he clearly violated as well as his Oath.
Reply Retweet Like
Carolyn McMahon Feb 7
A young officer taking command of a damaged ship and winning a battle because he believed the CoC above him was all dead. Turns out one senior officer was still alive, so they executed the sailor for mutiny. He still won. He still did what was right Here, right matters.
Reply Retweet Like
George Little Feb 7
This is disgraceful. The maligning of a Purple Heart recipient has to stop. Do you wake up and feel good about the hate you spread and the example you set for our children?
Reply Retweet Like
cary Feb 7
UCMJ Article 88 - Contempt Toward Officials...Uses contemptuous words against the President which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. Make this Officer accountable for his actions
Reply Retweet Like
Stephen Smoot Feb 7
Incoming presidents should always put together their own team. This includes times when they take over from another president in the same party.
Reply Retweet Like
Definitely NOT TG Feb 7
This president wont even appoint actual cabinet members. Many of them are "acting" heads of office. That is so they are only accountable to him, not subject to scrutiny of the Senate. He's more focused on concentrating stacking the courts with unqualified partisan judges.
Reply Retweet Like