Twitter | Search | |
Sam Harries
Father | Husband | Head of Marketing | Part-time SEO consultant | Part-time | Moderator of Reddit's Section | Thoughts my own.
10,942
Tweets
297
Following
695
Followers
Tweets
Sam Harries Feb 21
Replying to @LordManley
I'm pretty sure my follower count increased with the bots being banned.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 21
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 21
So... Brexit might not happen? Oh god please.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries retweeted
Jonathan Hibberd Feb 17
Disgusted to hear that UKIP have voted to remove Henry Bolton as leader. Democracy means voting once and living with the decision forever. What part of Henry Bolton don't they understand?
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 17
Replying to @David_Tapp
My advice is to the pick the individual, and take their agency, not the agency and take their individual. If that makes sense.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries retweeted
Gary Feb 17
5.0 Earthquake in Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Early reports are that in has caused an estimated £1.5m worth of improvements
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries retweeted
Cam Bryan Feb 17
Did we just leave the EU?
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries retweeted
dan barker Feb 15
Google, who make most of their money from advertising, will today begin policing which ads from competitor advertisers appear if you browse using chrome.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 13
JavaScript Cryptomining Scripts Discovered in 19 Google Play Apps
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
Person A attacks those that believe X. Person B attacks those that attack others. You're Person C in this, seemingly a bored troll.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
.... I feel as though you've read things I haven't said?
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
I assume that is a reference to something that I do not get. Trans-people are whatever pronoun they prefer, and those that prefer access to the free-market should also not be attacked for their economic beliefs. This was my whole point before you de-railed.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
It is semantics. If I substituted "Lord Digby Jones and those that conduct himself like he does" - you wouldn't be engaged in this, also, ridiculous argument.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
No, those that can argue without ridicule and ad hominem can be engaged with. Those that lead with their own unprompted ridicule and attacks are not capable of being reasoned with.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
Again you're arguing semantics. I was literally backwards referencing within my sentences.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
"These people" being a reference to people that use "Remoaners" - this is a problem with our 'side' too Manley, in that we spend a lot of time arguing semantics, rather than trying to properly approach the problem.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
Literally using ad hominem to attack opponents blindly is a ridiculous tactic, and those that do so should be ridiculed.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Also, reading it, I like that is references "bullies" and yet uses bullying tactics ala "remoaners"... The cognitive dissonance these people possess....
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Anyone who uses Remoaners un-ironically (and perhaps also ironically) should be loaded into cannons and fired into concrete. It is useful though in that I know I can disregard the rest of their arguement without having to read it though.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Harries Feb 12
Replying to @LordManley
It does but "Only women are children's care givers" - is a pervasive and toxic mentality that is unlikely to disappear even in my lifetime.
Reply Retweet Like