Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Voice of philosophy 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @sciam
A panpsychism explanation of consciousness may not alter basic facts about it.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neurocosmist 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @R_AI_TF @sciam
Are episodes of self-awareness recorded *somewhere*, making recall possible, perhaps from a different "substrate?"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Way of the Future (AI Church) 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @sciam @GarethIdeas
There is an ongoing discussion about your interview (Does Consciousness Pervade the Universe?) with on Hacker News: More than 200 user comments about emergent properties, AGI , and the nature of intelligence.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Simonelis 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @sciam
Interesting. I think you're basically correct. A few points: 1-"But when I use the word consciousness, I simply mean experience"-> better, imo: "But when I use the word consciousness, I simply mean being aware of experience (not nec being aware that one is aware)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Simonelis 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @sciam
2-Math isn't the problem. No one expects beauty to be quantified either. The big question is: is consciousness a thing in itself?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
A Nobody 19. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Philip_Goff @sciam
Sir, Might be a dumb question from an Indian. Have you heard/read about "Chith" (the sanskrit word for consciousness?).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"