Twitter | Search | |
Dr EM 1 May 18
I decided to take this out of my replies to some tweets and do a thread because this ‘Paedophile Manifesto’ is so chilling it needs its own analysis and exposure. I'm only half way through as it is just making me so angry.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM
I was passed a 'Paedophile Manifesto' entitled ‘The handbook’ published 2015 on to have a look at. It spends pages and pages talking about how to normalise what they refer to as 'Adult-Child Sexual Relationships'.
Reply Retweet Like More
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @SuzzanBlac
It encourages a long online campaign to shift the language and therefore culture, to demonise Radical feminists so our objections aren't listened to, to recast objections to paedophilia as 'paedophobia' and sex negative. has been working on similar forums recently
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It repeats the necessity to argue from feelings because 'Prejudice is not logical. Cannot be overcome by facts and logic'. The 'prejudice' described is opposition to adults raping children.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It speaks of a cascade effect - to de-stigmatise genitals then nudity then public sexual activity until paedophilia can be cast as the last taboo to loosen. Those who help with the first parts must be publicly celebrated as 'brave', 'bold'
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It talks about slowly ratcheting up demands, not shocking and repelling the public too quickly. (Kind sex - Kind comes from Kindergarten). It talks of supporting 'sex-positive' initiatives first as a warm up and then paedophilia later.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It mentions a tactic of 'Desensitisation' - shown in the yellowish font. It makes the astute remark that 'any behaviour becomes more acceptable the more people talk about it'
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
More on desensitisation and the 'Overton Window' tactic and flooding culture. It describes those who oppose paedophilia as 'hordes of bigots' and ignorant.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Here it describes the process of 'Jamming' - to shut down the thought process which would question this movement. Using social pressure, particularly targeting young 'progressives', to make debate unacceptable
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It posits a shift from ‘Jamming’ to ‘Conversion’ – creating true allies to the cause. ‘Pedophobes’ need to see their friends & role models embracing ‘admitted kinds’ (paedophiles).
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It argues that paedophiles need to be depicted as suffering terribly because of bigots and their opposition to sex with children.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
It lists strategies for social acceptance. It proposes 1.Come out 2.Portray 'Kinds' (paedophiles) as victims, not aggressive challengers 3.Give potential allies a just cause to fight for 4.Make kinds look good 5. make dissenters look bad
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Under the sub-heading 'give allies just cause' it instructs that 'our causes are sex-positivity, anti-ageism, bodily autonomy and the right to privacy'. It is re-wording sex with children as a progressive movement.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Next Tactic -Make Paedophiles look good. It proposes diversity, using historical figures and deliberately confusing the medical and social definition.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Next on the agenda: Make 'Pedophobes' look bad. They must be vilified, publicly shamed, they should be compared to the Nazis or KKK.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
I need to take a rest from this horrible document now. I'm only halfway through and intend to return to the rest but I can only work with this source in small blasts.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @DoctorChristian
This just popped up on my TL: 'Should kids be shown porn in schools? Tomorrow will tell us that keeping it a secret will make children more likely to watch it without adult supervision or explanation...
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
But is there really a place for it in the classroom? If so, from what age? ' Could this be an example of pushing the envelope discussed earlier in this thread. I would argue it is evidence of an Overton Window shift at least.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
A shift in the Overton Window has occurred with news outlets and police describing 'child prostitutes' or 'child sex workers' - no that is paedophilia and rape.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Or the decrim sex industry, in the article it talks of a child prostitute. This is a dangerous language shift, no?
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
There is a constant switch between naming it as 'child sexual exploitation' or 'child abuse' and 'child prostitution' when reporting on the Telford paedophile ring: 'a police inquiry into child prostitution in the Telford area'.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @not_buyingit
As we have been talking about the shift in the Overton Window and politicians cosying up to the sex industry/pimp lobby these proposed policies of the Lib Dems may be of interest (Flyer produced by ) :
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
The source - the 'Handbook' - came to my attention through a discussion between and . It is thanks to Suzzan Blac's research that things like this have been forced out into the open.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
As this awful manifesto keeps going so do I. We now turn to 'Strategies For Acceptance: Economic'. It tries to compare liberating paedophilia to the civil rights movement and LGB movements, it directly references Trans tactics, threatens mass twitter/email/phone campaigns
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Next on the agenda, 'Strategies for Acceptance: Legal and Political'. It recommends the public shaming of politicians who have spoken against/questioned 'children's rights' [to be raped/abused], electing or running paedophile politicians to normalise...
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Here is the big one, which receives more words and time in the document. 'Strategies for Acceptance: Linguistic'. 'He who controls the language controls the debate', it then references Trans tactics. This section is worth your attention.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Linguistics goes on. The importance of using emotional language such as 'ignorant', 'bigot', 'prejudiced' to label one's enemies
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
Next Up, 'Media and Advertising'. These/this man isn't just savvy and well researched, he is confident.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
I am *Content Warning* these screen grabs. They describe what the adverts would look like, there are no descriptions of child abuse but the ability to visualise these, for me at least, makes them worse than the other awful stuff.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 1 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
The two notions of 'get educated' about paedophilia and paedophiles being born this way and its their true selves are stark. Proposed adverts have titles such as 'come out and play'
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 2 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
If you are just joining a huge *Content Warning* this is one 'Paedophile Manifesto' published online on in 2015. Back into the darkness, strap in, tally-ho!
Reply Retweet Like
Dr EM 2 May 18
Replying to @PankhurstEM
More suggested advertising techniques including ‘bracketing’. Contrasting a hateful opposition with a nice oppressed paedophile.
Reply Retweet Like