|
@PTetlock | |||||
|
in that case, it's also "official" that the World Economic Forum needs a remedial course in Research Methods. Correlation doesn't "mean" causality--and that is even true for claims that are pitch perfect for corporate PR purposes. twitter.com/wef/status/121…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
David Fisher
@fisherdbus
|
16. sij |
|
It was not the lights that mattered.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Bennett
@mpbennett
|
16. sij |
|
“Hawthorne Effect”
|
||
|
|
||
|
Eric Jardine
@ehljardine
|
16. sij |
|
Perhaps, too, healthy firms (whatever that means) produces happy employees...No one wants to work at a place that is unhealthy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Steve Murray
@SteveMurrayM4
|
16. sij |
|
Yes, quite...#ProximateUltimateLetsCallTheWholeThingOff
|
||
|
|
||
|
John Michael Kelly
@jmkelly91
|
16. sij |
|
It depends. An r of .31 means almost 10% of the variance can be explained by that one variable. Since I'd expect customer loyalty to be predicted by quite a few factors, I think that's actually a pretty sizable effect.
|
||
|
|
||
|
David Fisher
@fisherdbus
|
16. sij |
|
What was the name of the reseach in the 60s where by merely changing the lights production went up?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Bennett
@mpbennett
|
16. sij |
|
Clickbait headline. Buried in the report is admission re: correlation/causality. One could also consider what “means” means 😃
|
||
|
|
||
|
Brian Labatte
@BudLite_1
|
16. sij |
|
Man. I’d like to know more about the data; time period, country, firm, employee demographics, and on and on. And the methods to assemble it. And why was such a basic error missed or not challenge. Need a superforecaster course @superforecaster
|
||
|
|
||