Twitter | Search | |
#DestroyTheAadhaar
On 21-Aug, UDie announced that it had saved 90,000 crores. Intrigued by the magnitude of the savings, I decided to file an RTI request. This thread documents my journey into the labyrinth.
Reply Retweet Like More
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
I posed the following 4 questions to UDie
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
UDie in its response stated that: (A) the details of the 90,000 crores were available on (B) the schemes are being administered by various departments / ministries and for questions 2-4 I should seek information from the relevant ministry
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
On visiting the DBT portal, I observed that there were significant savings under "Petroleum & Natural Gas", "Food & Public Distribution", "Rural Development" and "Others". Accordingly, I raised 4 separate RTI requests to each of these ministries / departments
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
Part 1 - The Department of Food and Public Distribution (DoF&PD) Excerpts of the response provided by DoF&PD are attached (PII has been edited out).
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
The reply is illuminating as it highlights several factors that could lead to savings apart from Aadhaar - (a) digitization of ration cards/beneficiary and other databases, (b) computerization of supply-chain management, (c) setting up of transparency portals; and ...
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
(d) … "apart from adoption of other means such as detection of in-eligible beneficiaries/families, transfer/migration of families, death(s), change in the economic status of the household (e.g. govt, job) etc" - none of (d) can be determined by Aadhaar
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @rozi_roti
The DoF&PD estimates a savings of 17,500 cr per annum. Contrast this with the schedule in the Union Budget 2018, which shows that subsides on Food grew from 1.10 lakh cr in FY 17 to 1.40 lakh cr in FY 18 (27%!!!) and will further increase to 1.69 lakh cr (21%!!!) FYI
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
Another illuminating aspect is the numbers cited by the DoF&PD for the state of Maharashtra. As per the DoF&PD, 21.6 lakh ration cards were deleted from 2013 - 2017 (with 0 bogus cards deleted in 2017!). Let us assume for a moment that all of this is due to Aadhaar.
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
As per the Govt of Maharashtra, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, during the period 2005 - 2011, 54 lakh bogus ration cards were deleted. Source:
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
With no Aadhaar during the period 2005 - 2009, unlikely that the state of digitisation / computerisation of databases / records to have been better in 2005 - 2011 as compared to 2014 - 2017, still the Govt of Maharashtra identified more duplicates than the post Aadhaar period!
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
Doesn't the weight of the evidence lead one to believe that an alternate fully functional and effective mechanism to identifying bogus ration cards existed much before Aadhaar?
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
The DoF&PD did not respond to questions 3 and 4 raised by me. If 17,500 crores per annum (as they estimate) were being siphoned, surely someone needs to be held accountable?
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
Summary for the DoF&PD: (A) Alternate effective mechanisms existed for the identification of bogus ration cards (B) Maharashtra detected significantly larger bogus ration cards pre-Aadhaar than post Aadhaar (C) 17,500 crores p.a being siphoned but nobody caught and prosecuted.
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
Part 2 - The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoP&NG) The MoP&NG provided a response in 3 parts (excerpts below and PII has been edited out).
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
As the first part of it's response, the MoP&NG said that the information sought pertained to UDie and sent it back to UDie. In response to my very first query to UDie (see image), I was directed to the individual ministries. Now the ministry was directing me back to UDie.
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
In response to the MoP&NG redirection, UDie redirected the query back to the MoP&NG who in turn sent it again to the Public Information Officer of the 3 Oil Marketing Companies (OMC). (PII has been edited out) Journey so far from inception: UDie > MoP&NG > UDie > MoP&NG > OMC
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
The response of the 3 OMC is attached below (PII has been edited out). These are some of the things I find very interesting: 1. BPCL categorically refutes the words "fake, duplicate and ghost connections" - the very words used by UDie
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
2. BPCL states that it does not maintain information for question # 2 - savings through use of Aadhaar separately from other process improvements. This is critical - how is one to evaluate the usefulness of Aadhaar if there is no data available
Reply Retweet Like
#DestroyTheAadhaar Nov 17
Replying to @Orionis57
3. HPCL and IOCL both respond that the query on "fakes, duplicate and ghost beneficiaries is not clear" - again disputing the very language used by UDie.
Reply Retweet Like