|
@OHaggstrom | |||||
|
I wonder what percentage of self-proclaimed one-boxers are actually one-boxers at heart, as opposed to merely trying to trick future superintelligent Newcomb organizers.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Magnus Borgh 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇸🇪
@SpinVector
|
26. sij |
|
Amazingly, this is the first time I have encountered Newcomb’s Paradox. Is there a succinct way of explaining why it is an interesting problem? I understand it’s formulation, but fail, as yet, to see the significance beyond illustrating importance of hidden assumptions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Olle Häggström
@OHaggstrom
|
26. sij |
|
Your question is impossible to do justice within a single tweet, but the NP touches on thorny issues in, e.g., rationality, the fundamentals of decision theory, causality, artificial intelligence and whether we might possibly be living in a computer simulation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fredrik Paulsson
@FredrikPaulsson
|
25. sij |
|
Jag TYCKTE jag kände igen ditt namn! Skulle precis fråga om du läst Johan Wästlunds blogg om Newcomb och där står ju ditt namn! wastlund.blogspot.com/2016/04/newcom…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Olle Häggström
@OHaggstrom
|
25. sij |
|
Han har en relaterad bloggpost från 2018 om en självkörande bil som kör mot rött ljus "for the hell of it". Jag skrev om den i förrgår, i mitt halvfärdiga bokmanus.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Anders Grandell
@AEGrandell
|
26. sij |
|
I am a self-proclaimed one-boxer, but definitely not because I am trying to trick anyone, let alone the predictor.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Olle Häggström
@OHaggstrom
|
26. sij |
|
They all say that.
|
||
|
|
||