Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Olle Häggström
I wonder what percentage of self-proclaimed one-boxers are actually one-boxers at heart, as opposed to merely trying to trick future superintelligent Newcomb organizers.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Magnus Borgh 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇸🇪 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @OHaggstrom
Amazingly, this is the first time I have encountered Newcomb’s Paradox. Is there a succinct way of explaining why it is an interesting problem? I understand it’s formulation, but fail, as yet, to see the significance beyond illustrating importance of hidden assumptions.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Olle Häggström 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SpinVector
Your question is impossible to do justice within a single tweet, but the NP touches on thorny issues in, e.g., rationality, the fundamentals of decision theory, causality, artificial intelligence and whether we might possibly be living in a computer simulation.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fredrik Paulsson 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @OHaggstrom
Jag TYCKTE jag kände igen ditt namn! Skulle precis fråga om du läst Johan Wästlunds blogg om Newcomb och där står ju ditt namn!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Olle Häggström 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FredrikPaulsson
Han har en relaterad bloggpost från 2018 om en självkörande bil som kör mot rött ljus "for the hell of it". Jag skrev om den i förrgår, i mitt halvfärdiga bokmanus.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Anders Grandell 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @OHaggstrom
I am a self-proclaimed one-boxer, but definitely not because I am trying to trick anyone, let alone the predictor.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Olle Häggström 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AEGrandell
They all say that.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"