Twitter | Search | |
sMyle
&& | developer 🥑 | Torontonian at ❤️ | Opinions are potentially wrong, but definitely my own. | He / Him
35,759
Tweets
2,459
Following
13,620
Followers
Tweets
sMyle 2h
Replying to @evanplaice
I don't mind .mjs MylesJavaScript! tap "worked ish". Coverage isn't working right now and I have to pass `--no-esm` to turn off the esm shim.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 2h
Replying to @jankrems
good eye lol
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 3h
That is not part of what would be specified at TC39... JSON modules were originally specified in WHATWG within the HTML spec. A JSON module exported a single object as a default. IMHO TC39 would only specify the mechanism for declaring type not the semantics
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 3h
Finally finished an experimental ESM refactoring of my module `node-osc` * completely rewritten using ESM * Fully tested using tap * rollup to generate CJS * experimental conditional exports for CJS + ESM entry points * self-reference for examples + tests
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 4h
Replying to @mikeal
just loaders not being prime time yet or a specific issue?
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @mikeal
Which bugs?
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @brianleroux
Last night was the first time in my own bed in 10 days... and I leave again on Tuesday. I don't wanna go anywhere
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @brianleroux
I'm snuggled in bed and not really looking to change that except to maybe eat food... the maybe being leaving the bed not the eating.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Are you going to be at ? I'll be around and would have time to chat.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @JSPartyFM @nodejs and 4 others
Also to be clear... this isn't meant as a knock on any of the guests, they are all super awesome 🎉 More that the implementation is still shifting on a daily basis and it is hard to keep up even if you are the one implementing 😅
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle retweeted
sMyle 5h
Replying to @openjsf @Google
If you are coming to and want to meet 1:1 with a Googler to answer your questions please fill out this form so we can schedule time!
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @openjsf @Google
If you are coming to and want to meet 1:1 with a Googler to answer your questions please fill out this form so we can schedule time!
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @brianleroux
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle retweeted
OpenJS Foundation Dec 3
We're so happy to have as a diamond💎 sponsor for ! The Google team will be on-site, leading great talks and staffing the Google Lounge! Stop by and get your questions answered! Learn more about Google at the event here:
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 5h
Replying to @JSPartyFM @nodejs and 4 others
If you do a follow up please lmk. Would be good to have someone working on the implementation included in a conversation to ensure accurate discussion... so much is changing so quickly.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 8h
This is just my opinion. There are 4 champions and they might not all agree with me.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 8h
I definitely am amenable to hearing various use cases and different approaches, but I am weary of scope creep with this proposal. Best bet is another call with interested stakeholders. It is possible we have multiple proposals here 🎉
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 8h
This proposal was originally born out of a security concern with JSON modules where a developer could have imported JSON but server could have served JS with the appropriate mime type and cause unexpected code execution. So to be clear my personal goal is solving this case
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 9h
I think we have inverted use cases. This proposal is about specifying the module type you are importing. It seems like you want to annotate the type being exported. Might be worth considering a different name for the proposal.
Reply Retweet Like
sMyle 9h
Oh no it's santa day
Reply Retweet Like