Twitter | Search | |
Michael E. Mann
At this rate, Muller should be caught up to the current state of climate science within a matter of just a few years!
Reply Retweet Like More
Ted Auch 28 Jul 12
So only if he collects and analyzes data is climate change legit? The plural of anecdote is data!!!
Reply Retweet Like
Greg Laden 28 Jul 12
It must be boring to have study after study confirm what you and colleagues demonstrated years ago.
Reply Retweet Like
Mauri Pelto 29 Jul 12
More important he caught up attention wise.
Reply Retweet Like
Nick Carter 29 Jul 12
LOL seems he gets AGW part but not climate change? Is that right?
Reply Retweet Like
Michael E. Mann 29 Jul 12
I think that's about right Nick, at least if we are to judge him from the comments in his op-ed.
Reply Retweet Like
Chris Dunford 29 Jul 12
@empirical_bayes Amen. And Muller should be required to post mea culpa comments on the YT videos once a week, too.
Reply Retweet Like
Fred Bortz 29 Jul 12
Greg, you do Muller a disservice. He has a history of seeing things with a novel perspective.
Reply Retweet Like
Greg Laden 29 Jul 12
wut? what did I say about Muller?
Reply Retweet Like
Fred Bortz 29 Jul 12
Given the news, I read "Muller" into "study after study". If new perspective adds something, it isn't boring.
Reply Retweet Like
Greg Laden 29 Jul 12
The new perspective seems to be similar to 15y.a. mainstream climate science. No disservice intended .
Reply Retweet Like
Fred Bortz 29 Jul 12
No question his conclusion was not new but Muller got there by different route That's strong support Not boring :)
Reply Retweet Like
Greg Laden 29 Jul 12
The entire climate denialist thing is shameful. There is nothing whatsoever good about it. Boring= euphemism.
Reply Retweet Like
Fred Bortz 29 Jul 12
Aah that's the difference. Muller was never a denialist just a skeptic who had a question to test
Reply Retweet Like
Arthur Dent 30 Jul 12
@empirical_bayes No need to apologise for stating the truth
Reply Retweet Like