Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
David Chapman
🆕 Much of my explanation of how and why rationality works (the middle part of the book) is a simplified presentation of ethnomethodological concepts and findings in easier language. It’s hip! You need to be able to say “ethnomethodology” confidently
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Michael Buckley 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
Very clear. Much more relatable than my “monkeys wearing hats”.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Chapman 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @michaelabuckley
Thanks! Google is failing me… monkeys wearing hats?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
existentialpervert69 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
The first time I encountered the reasonable/rational distinction was in an academic legal paper. You wrote an example of nebulous conceptual boundaries a while back that sounded a lot like a hypothetical from a law school exam.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
existentialpervert69 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
My point I guess is that there is a field of study that has to formalize messy, illegible human conflicts and do so in a way that we can mostly live with, and it sounds like it encapsulates a lot of the critiques of formal rationality ya got going on here.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
KimSia Sim 🇸🇬💻📗 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
Really like the table and implications in this page Especially "Deciding whether to approach a particular situation reasonably or rationally is a meta-rational judgement.”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
ishi crew 17 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
i prefer everyday randomness as opposed to reasonableness. also since i'm into meditation i like mindlessness meditation' as opposed to mindfulness. meaning less is more
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"