Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
David Chapman 30. sij
Difficult, important exploration of the manufacture of official knowledge by : on good and bad bullshit, ethnomethodology vs social science, a painstaking debunking of a Fact, and the original sin of psychology.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Chapman 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @literalbanana
I had to read this twice to (mostly?) understand it. The logic of the argument is precise, but hidden in an exquisite bejeweled puzzle-box: playful misdirections, riddles, apparent non-sequiturs whose relevance the reader suddenly realizes much later... I love this stuff!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Chapman
Because the content is important, I'm tempted to write a summary extracting the main points, for those who might not take the time to solve the puzzles. That would spoil the fun for other readers, though.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
very offline potat 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness @literalbanana
wait until you find the DLC, where a fight about a stupid technical point completely misses the point, but also illustrates the banana's point better than anything else could
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"