|
@Meaningness | |||||
|
Difficult, important exploration of the manufacture of official knowledge by @literalbanana: on good and bad bullshit, ethnomethodology vs social science, a painstaking debunking of a Fact, and the original sin of psychology.
carcinisation.com/2020/01/27/ign…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
David Chapman
@Meaningness
|
30. sij |
|
I had to read this twice to (mostly?) understand it. The logic of the argument is precise, but hidden in an exquisite bejeweled puzzle-box: playful misdirections, riddles, apparent non-sequiturs whose relevance the reader suddenly realizes much later... I love this stuff!
|
||
|
|
||
|
David Chapman
@Meaningness
|
30. sij |
|
Because the content is important, I'm tempted to write a summary extracting the main points, for those who might not take the time to solve the puzzles. That would spoil the fun for other readers, though.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Riverless Uniform
@RiverlessU
|
31. sij |
|
I haven't seen any riddle.
What I caught, please tell me if you think I'm missing something big:
- Exploration of:
+ Indexicality
+ Epistemology as a Game with rules
+ Myths as not even Indexical Knowledge, but mere Indexes/Pointers
- Application of this to social science
|
||
|
|
||