Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Fate Of Twist 2. kol
Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Chapman 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
“The absence of thought with the presence of awareness” seems relatively unproblematic. (Although the possibility if rhat is denied by some major philosophers.) Nb I don’t particularly advocate that definition, just noting it as reasonably inoffensive metaphysically
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
What do you not like about it, that it is in some sense misleading (like given differing interpretations of what "thought" is), or that it is outright false/there is more to it?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
What is it like for you, or anyone who has practice with emptiness, to be confronted by the question "what is 94 + 67", and to answer it? From reading your stuff, it doesn't seem like emptiness is incompatible with computing this, but that seems incompatible with "no thought"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"