|
@Meaningness | |||||
|
“The absence of thought with the presence of awareness” seems relatively unproblematic. (Although the possibility if rhat is denied by some major philosophers.) Nb I don’t particularly advocate that definition, just noting it as reasonably inoffensive metaphysically
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
|
||
|
|
||
|
David Chapman
@Meaningness
|
2. kol |
|
“of that”, typo
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
What do you not like about it, that it is in some sense misleading (like given differing interpretations of what "thought" is), or that it is outright false/there is more to it?
|
||
|
|
||