Leslie McAdoo Gordon

@McAdooGordon

Lawyer - security clearances, debarment, gov’t employee discipline, criminal/OIG investigations trials & appeals; expert (clearance law) in federal court & DoD

Washington, DC
Joined May 2017

Tweets

You blocked @McAdooGordon

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @McAdooGordon

  1. Pinned Tweet
    4 Sep 2020

    *Georgetown Law, 1996 *Licensed: DC, MD & VA; federal trial & appeals courts & Supreme Court *Former DOD Special Agent (security clearance background investigations) *Criminal investigations, trials & appeals, clearance & debarment cases (Header pic: Gettysburg Battlefield)

    Undo
  2. According to multiple law enforcement sources federal investigators have narrowed down the retail chain where the two 60-minute kitchen timers were bought as well as the end caps used to assemble the two viable pipe bombs placed outside the RNC + DNC. A forensic

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. 23 hours ago

    Some good news for me on this Friday: Hubs (who’s in his 70s) is getting the first dose of the vaccine this afternoon. 👍🏻 A major step toward getting back to normal at our house. 🙏🏻

    Undo
  4. 23 hours ago

    It’s a device for safely conveying information between the sides. The client has to tell the truth in the meeting tho; it’s a separate criminal offense to lie in the meeting. /3

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. 23 hours ago

    It can be a prelude to a cooperation agreement, but in white collar cases it is also often used as a tool to let the prosecutors see that the client is not guilty, not as guilty as they think, not guilty of what or everything *they* think he’s guilty of, or is a witness only. /2

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. 23 hours ago

    This is what criminal lawyers call a “Queen for a day” agreement. Some folks call it a “proffer” agreement. Boiled down it means your client talks to the prosecutors but what he says won’t be used against him. It is a useful tool for both sides of a case. /1

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Mar 4

    I mean, it’s ok to use the word nihilism. It’s a perfectly good word. And I think no word -& I mean no word- should be eliminated. But it’s 1 thing to say a way of thinking or belief system is nihilism & another to say behavior you don’t like is w/o explaining your rationale.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Mar 4

    Have you ever noticed how the only people who use the word “nihilism” to describe other people’s behavior are huge assholes?

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Mar 4

    This is why they are talking about creating an 80 officer continuously standing presence as one of the remedial measures. They are going to need that & more now.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Mar 4

    We live in an open society. Our enemies can relatively easily operate amongst us. The security pros must have been/be horrified at how clear it made it that the Capitol is a soft target.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Mar 4

    The powers that be won’t admit publicly that this is true, but it obviously is. Setting everything else aside, the riot on Jan 6 exposed that actual security at the Capitol was pretty nonexistent. One of our special ops teams could’ve waltzed in there in no time.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Mar 4

    This is Democrat theatre for sure. But I think it also separately reflects the unfortunate reality that the Capitol is likely not currently defensible against even a small but professionally trained force intent on killing our legislature if assembled by any one of our enemies.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Mar 4

    Exactly. 👇🏻Girls who are not hyper “girly” at certain stages, aka tomboys, are still girls. Girls develop into women each in their own way & at their own pace. Stop trying to force girls into a single mold of femininity. It’s misogyny.

    Undo
  14. Mar 4

    Boy am I having to block a number of idiots today. It’s like people are having conversations with themselves on your timeline. 🙄

    Undo
  15. Mar 4
    Undo
  16. Mar 4

    If we do, we will attract more people from the groups that Republicans have historically struggled with, because our core & enduring *political* ideas - liberty, opportunity, equality - are better than the Left's ideas.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Mar 4

    We are limiting our strength if we don't, which is dumb, gives the Left too much power & unnecessarily restricts our engagement in popular culture - which is upstream from politics. We're the party who should be championing the idea of the "loyal dissent."

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Mar 4

    As a philosophical libertarian, I find this uncontroversial. Some things are political, some are personal, some are religious/faith based. Those are 3 different things. As long as we agree on the first, we should be able to tolerate differences on the other two.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Mar 4

    This is a smart column by Kurt. 👇As modern Republicans, we should be fine that we don't all agree 100% on everything - we aren't Leftists. Gay Republicans & traditional-marriage Republicans are . . . Republicans. We're a political party, not an ideology.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Mar 3

    This is probably at least in part because some of them are charged in DC Superior Court rather than in US District Court. Superior Court is not on Pacer, but is available online on its own site.

    Undo
  21. Mar 3

    Hahahaha. Nope. They’ve been calling themselves that since the 1930s. This is just the latest round of their nonsense.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·