Twitter | Search | |
This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on 15 December 2020. Please switch to a supported browser or device. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
TSCM
5,090
Tweets
318
Following
6,849
Followers
Tweets
TSCM 19h
Replying to @JuliaBerkowitz1
Further, the judge did not fully block Finaldi from attempting deposition of Fox & Spence, though they'd likely object again. Judge does prohibit him from requesting the docs he had, or to inquire into their medical/psychological/sexual history and similar rights to privacy.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM 19h
Replying to @JuliaBerkowitz1
Finaldi fails to meaningfully address the court's ruling: "Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that he seeks information directly relevant to his own claims of sexual abuse...the stated desire for corroboration of Wade's [allegations] is not directly relevant to his claims."
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM 19h
Replying to @impavidus1
The majority of those he refers to recanted or otherwise explained that the police pressured them, distorted their reports, lied about false evidence, drafted insincere declarations and twisted reality. At this point Finaldi is a thousand leagues lower than grasping at straws.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @MJJRepository
Finaldi says Fox communicated w/ "individuals whom Wade believes had knowledge of MJ's crimes..." But the only person who should've "suspected" crimes was Wade's mother—as approached by Gutierrez in 1992. No staff ever suggested this until their tabloid paydays post-Aug. 1993.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @MJJRepository
While Finaldi keeps fuming over the sanctions imposed against him and the judge's tentative note that his unprofessional conduct toward MJ's counsel could be construed as gender incivility... He has no problem claiming Spence/Fox were "unwitting parties" to CSA procurement. 🙄
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @MJJRepository
For Spence, Finaldi argues that because Spence slept in MJ's bedroom and his family got gifts from him, this somehow makes a tie to the "procurement" of CSA with other kids and shows signs of grooming (recall that Wade's allegations actually skip any such "grooming" efforts.) 🤦‍♂️
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Finaldi's argument re: Fox/Spence was improperly redacted, allowing one to still read what it says. 😆 And it is nothing but more blind, meaningless conjecture just to try anything he can to depose Spence/Fox. Here's the unredacted version for Fox. A big ole nothing-burger.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @CarryMe_There
Any impartial person can see he is sincere and natural in his 1990-2011 interviews—including the outtakes he filmed for his own personal use while shooting a film at NL in 2007—and that he only became "robotic pre-rehearsed actor Robson" when he came up with these abuse claims.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Finaldi has filed a reply in response to the oppositions by Spence/Fox/Chandler/Marks where he once again acts as a broken record in attempting to portray them as "critical" to his case. A hearing is scheduled for Dec 4 to decide it.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @Caramelicedtea
Dan will cut out all of those moments from the court hearings, to instead focus on Finaldi whining "but what about this hearsay tabloid claim from the 1990s about there being a nude photo of Leroy that this bodyguard who failed Maury Povich's polygraph says he destroyed for MJ!?"
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
You are confusing civil litigation w/ criminal prosecution. There is no connection. The family's $$$ attorney confirmed the civil lawsuit had no relation to the criminal probe & the family was still cooperating. 13 month investigation + 2 grand juries and no criminal charges.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 25
Replying to @Adri98851740
Wade/James hoped that'd be the case, but really the new judge has been more rapid at making rulings + denying meritless motions than the original judge was. He also pushed Finaldi's latest motions up to Dec. 4, Finaldi originally scheduled them for next April. So it is good.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @Caramelicedtea
And this is how it's always been. Reading through his original complaint is hilarious because in between his CSA allegations (the only "actionable" claims he could make) he actually spends as much time talking about his "fate was sealed" when MJ "prophesized" of his success, etc.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @tokyophonline
It relates only to Wade's side wanting to depose Jordan's sister and ex-girlfriend, and their side not wanting to get involved. Wade's lawsuit against MJ's companies is still ongoing, this is just a tiny piece of it. The judge will hear these arguments on Dec. 4.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @MJJRepository
Finaldi's only declaration to support his motion for reconsideration were redacted excerpts from Pellicano's Aug. depo. A depo that, had it really been "of such great importance" to warrant reversing the judge's order, it would had been raised to the court prior to Sept. 24.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @MJJRepository
When Finaldi filed his motion for reconsideration, he padded it with claims of alleged new info that he never raised before. Attorney for Lily: Finaldi's argument doesn't come close to establishing she had personal knowledge, relevant testimony, admissible evidence...irrelevant.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @MJJRepository
Lily's Attorney: "A cursory examination of Plaintiff’s submission reveals that these arguments lack merit. Instead, the instant motion for reconsideration is nothing more than Plaintiff’s FRIVOLOUS ATTEMPT at a second bite of the proverbial apple."
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @MJJRepository
The attorney for Chandler/Marks has classified Finaldi's aggressive tactics as "persistent harassment and invasion of privacy" and in direct contradiction to Finaldi's own suggestion that "alleged victims and their families" shouldn't be obliged to discuss anything with him.
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Following last week's filings from Spence/Fox opposing Finaldi's motions, Lily & Tabitha filed their own this week. "NO new LEGITIMATE FACTS or LAW have been presented to warrant reconsideration of Court's September 24, 2020 order."
Reply Retweet Like
TSCM Nov 24
Replying to @SpeechlessMJJ16
The estate had one done! And it was in that evaluation he acknowledged that when he was 22 he really didn't believe that he would go to prison for saying he was abused as a child. But months later in depo he STILL attempted to use that excuse as one reason he testified for MJ...
Reply Retweet Like