Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Lori Hendry TEXT TRUMP TO 88022
Shouldn’t there be a law against constant and unrelenting harassment of the President of the United States? How many times are Democrats going to come up empty before the Supreme Court or Attorney General sees this for what it is ( PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT) and intervene?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Lori Hendry TEXT TRUMP TO 88022 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @christianllamar
Interesting. Thank you for that information Christian.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bruce Abramson 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lrihendry
It's a nice thought, but completely unworkable within a system that respects freedom. Laws against harassing, defaming, or insulting public officials are deeply dangerous.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Lori Hendry TEXT TRUMP TO 88022 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @bdabramson
What they’re doing to the president is beyond that.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Christian Lamar 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lrihendry
Supreme Court has mentioned Presidential Harassment but hasnt given precedent to fight against it. President Trump’s tenure shows both Article 1 & Article 3 powers can absolutely be weaponized to the detriment of United States Citizens who elect a POTUS to execute the law.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Reasonable Truth 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @christianllamar @u2biker @Lrihendry
AGree, we the People demand change of the House rules. The House must follow rules of evidence and due process rights. Without these fundamentals every President could be abused no matter what happens
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Stephen Szydlik 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lrihendry
The last 3 years the media and Dems criticism has been over the top; they invent things to complain about and worse, they NEVER give him credit for anything positive that he does. God Bless President Trump
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leesa FL 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SteveSzydlik @Lrihendry
Yes it’s harmful to our country and to the human psyche to focus only on lies and negative things. Then they wonder why so many people are nuts.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David @ KAG 2020 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lrihendry
Congressmen should not be immune from charges for lying to the public, like Schiff did when he read his version of the transcript . It incited people around the country, who weren’t interested in the real version after that
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Nan 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Bordercop7b @Lrihendry
That should have been stopped immediately. Absolute lies shouldnt be admissible in any trial or court, no matter what.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"