Twitter | Search | |
This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on 15 December 2020. Please switch to a supported browser or device. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
Scott Lemieux
It's also crucial to understand that the Wisconsin gerrymander, for example, is essentially unbreakable. Wisconsin Republicans could lose by more than 10% statewide and maintain control of the legislature
Reply Retweet Like More
Scott Lemieux 1 Jul 19
Replying to @LemieuxLGM
The old conventional wisdom that gerrymandering is risky in a swing state because it makes you vulnerable in a wave election just doesn't apply to some of the new computer-generated gerrymanders
Reply Retweet Like
Stephen Judkins 1 Jul 19
Replying to @LemieuxLGM
One interesting point is that gerrymanders like this have pretty extreme tail risk for the gerrymandering party. Sure, it's very unlikely that Republicans could lose by 15% but if they do Democrats could gain an enormous majority
Reply Retweet Like
Scott Lemieux 1 Jul 19
Replying to @stephenjudkins
That risk is really trivial, though.
Reply Retweet Like
MKE not MIKE 1 Jul 19
Replying to @LemieuxLGM
I left WI in 2009 and returned in 2016 - I weep at the damage done by Walker and the WI GOP...
Reply Retweet Like
Jef Poskanzer 1 Jul 19
Replying to @LemieuxLGM @trabernlaw
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
Reply Retweet Like
Kristin Rawls 1 Jul 19
North Carolina too.
Reply Retweet Like
Joey Christmas 1 Jul 19
Replying to @LemieuxLGM
Supreme Courts take
Reply Retweet Like
Jon Kortebein 1 Jul 19
The thinnest reed is evidently completely compelling?
Reply Retweet Like