Twitter | Search | |
This is the legacy version of We will be shutting it down on 15 December 2020. Please switch to a supported browser or device. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
Anna Brees Nov 9
This is not strong enough evidence at all. You would need a Whistleblower with significant responsibility & authority who has been involved in the fraud of tens of thousands of votes. I still have not seen that evidence.
Reply Retweet Like
WeAreEverywhere Nov 9
Replying to @BreesAnna
Alone maybe not but cumulative with the other evidence it’s definitely enough.
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Smith
I would say say. It's justification for an investigation. I've seen huge scandals emerge because people dismissed bits of evidence, appointing themselves as early on experts. Sex scandals in particular.
Reply Retweet Like More
Kevin Smith Nov 9
There is no difference in terms of how you assess evidence. You can't reach a conclusion at this stage. Don't dismiss and don't say evidence compelling. Early days. Too many jumping the gun.
Reply Retweet Like
Phil Nov 9
This is alleged voter fraud not sex scandals and there is nothing that warrant further investigation, even republicans have said they don't see anything unusual.
Reply Retweet Like