|
@KelseyTuoc | |||||
|
He argues that if we instead design AIs whose objective is to get a better model of humans and do what we want, then there's still a lot which can go wrong - but more competent AI means better outcomes instead of meaning worse ones. That's a safer paradigm to be working in.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Kelsey Piper
@KelseyTuoc
|
26. lis |
|
Met with Stuart Russell to talk about the future of AI and his new book, Human Compatible: vox.com/future-perfect…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Kelsey Piper
@KelseyTuoc
|
26. lis |
|
Russell's key point: right now, we design AIs with objective functions that don't encompass what we actually want. That means that the "smarter" they get - the better they optimize for something that's not what we want - the worse off we are.
|
||
|
|
||