Twitter | Search | |
Josh Goldberg 😍
Front end ✨ Previous: () ✨ Side: open source things ✨ Web dev; Nintendo ripper-offer; waiting for my next DMCA takedown.
1,615
Tweets
3,596
Following
926
Followers
Tweets
Josh Goldberg 😍 5h
Still got Rails under the hood, but less and less as the years go on... πŸ˜‰
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Replying to @Hoffm @Codecademy
OMG PLS How about if the substring "lol" is in the search query? Assuming here it's not desirable for regular searches to somehow make LOLCODE the first result like was happening in QA for... "programming", I think it was?
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Replying to @JoshuaKGoldberg
OTOH it does give a result for Web Development...
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
I'd like to report a bug, searching "lolcode" in the site doesn't give results for the LOLCODE course. 😠 upsetting
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Not quite as many, alas... from yesterday.
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
If we keep this up, we'll hit 0 lines of code by end of year
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
"...you'll need to do so more than 12 hours in advance of your session start time to receive a full refund." 3/3 Hope this helps! should be updated soon with this info. ❀️
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
"...receive a refund if you attend the session, which will be processed within 24 hours of your appointment end time. Additionally, if you need to cancel/reschedule, you'll need to cancel/reschedule, ..." 2/3
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Hey good question! It's "free" in that you'll be refunded if you attend. Specifics from the support team: "Payment Terms: As a Codecademy Pro member, you are granted one FREE 30-minute 1-on-1 with a Code Coach. You will only ..." 1/3
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Replying to @a_habib_91 @Codecademy
Ha, yes, great workaround! πŸ… The issue was just the link in the intensive dashboard no longer routing to the lesson. It's been fixed.
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Replying to @csatrpi
Congrats Prof. Patterson!!! πŸ™ŒπŸŽ‰
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 24
Replying to @a_habib_91 @Codecademy
Confirmed, we're on it!
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Replying to @IllusionMH
Clearly we should just deprecate the project then, that'll fix everything
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Replying to @slimydustypink
Use those Codecademy skills to make an old school rs bot - then you can spend more time coding πŸ’ͺ
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Replying to @disco_breaker
that's how you break things zach
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 retweeted
Matt Bierner May 23
I wrote a post about why we enabled strict null checking in the source and how we pulled it off without going crazy: It’s not really a story about TypeScript but about using bugs as signals of hazards, and then incrementally fixing those hazards
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Replying to @karaluton
Also relevant: Microsoft's UI library has what's basically a fancy custom equivalent of Storybook:
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
Replying to @karaluton @Codecademy
We use Storybook and it's pretty nifty. Would recommend! πŸ™Œ has maybe half our components and thanks for the reminder to put more on it hehe.
Reply Retweet Like
Josh Goldberg 😍 May 23
haters gonna hate
Reply Retweet Like