Twitter | Search | |
Jordan Schachtel
Another straw man from French. Vindman does not have any "evidence" that is not already publicly available. He has never even spoken to POTUS. Ppl are critiquing him for believing he has authority to subvert the presidency & conduct his own foreign policy.
Reply Retweet Like More
Julie Kelly Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
That’s all he’s got
Reply Retweet Like
A K T ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
If Vindman wants to conduct his own foreign policy, he should run for President.
Reply Retweet Like
The Ire of Burke Oct 29
From the perspective of my Army service, I question his conduct. >Violating NOFORN protocols >Jumping the clear boundaries of his Compartment (especially for a non-native citizen with his relative's home country) >Unprofessional Conduct for Uniformed Military
Reply Retweet Like
Samuel J. Cook, III, | CPT, CNC, USTFCCCA Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
It’s over, Jordan. Have some dignity.
Reply Retweet Like
goroke Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
I am simply treating this as something which is not newsworthy. Either he agrees with the transcript of the call, in which case there is nothing to see here...
Reply Retweet Like
goroke Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
...or he is alleging that all of the people who transcribed and then reconciled their transcriptions conspired to falsify the record. If the latter, he needs to produce one hell of a lot of evidence to support his dissenting recollection.
Reply Retweet Like
ʟɛօռ Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
Yep. The straw man lives.
Reply Retweet Like
Pamela Klem 🗽 Oct 29
Replying to @JordanSchachtel
Vindman:On 7/10 Sondland directed Zelensky's defense secretary Danylyuk to investigate Biden as condition of POTUS meeting (=quid pro quo). Also he & Hill twice raised legal concerns at precise time WH was scrambling to bury the call summary (=coverup).
Reply Retweet Like