Twitter | Search | |
John Pfaff
1. Every time I write abt prison gerrymandering, find it amazing it is a thing that exists. That we are so blasé about a FIVE-FIFTHS compromise.
Reply Retweet Like More
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
2. In 44 states, prisoners “live” in their prisons for the purpose of the Census but cannot vote: bodies with no electoral power.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
3. Crime is disproportionately concentrated in cities, and those sent to prison are disproportionately POC—and thus disproportionately Dem-leaning.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
4. Yet prisons are increasingly located in more-rural, more conservative communities. Democratic prisoners in Republican counties:
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
5. All across the country, rural legislators are holding onto their seats because of the people in their prisons. See for so many examples.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
6. I mean, look at these counties. Can you identify the prison? (Green = black person, red = Hispanic, blue = whites.) One is NY’s Clinton Prison, the other CA’s notorious Pelican Bay.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
7. The Census Bureau right now is in total disarray, which is hugely problematic for ten thousand reasons. But means it won’t fix this.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
8. The only states to fix this are CA, DE, MD, and NY: deep blue states that passed changes when Dems controlled both chambers and gov.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
9. Even in NY, Senate GOP managed to split a district in half to add a seat bc knew the math: moving counts back to NYC, Buffalo would cause a net GOP loss.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
10. Anyway, prison gerrymandering is one of those non-exciting topics (“Hi, can I talk to you about Census enumeration policies?!” does… not keep ppl’s attention) that is HUGELY critical.
Reply Retweet Like
John Pfaff Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
11. I was writing about it now, and the deep injustice of it and its seeming intractability meant that I had to vent about it on Twitter, in hopes at least a few more ppl will oppose it.
Reply Retweet Like
Keith Humphreys Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
This was my pickup line in college. Yes, I was lonely - why?
Reply Retweet Like
Caryn Emmons Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
I promise you next time we get together we can talk about prison gerrymandering!
Reply Retweet Like
#StillNotEqual Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
Gov Christie vetoed an effort to end prison gerrymandering in NJ, but it should be doable once Murphy takes office.
Reply Retweet Like
One Eyed Balt Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
Of where are prisoners residents in the jurisdictions that have addressed this issue? Their most recent residence before incarceration?
Reply Retweet Like
Will Wilkinson 🌐 Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
Christ, I didn't know about this. Gonna slip it into the city disenfranchisement piece I'm writing.
Reply Retweet Like
Dara Lind Dec 10
Damn, if you didn't know about this it is even more underexposed than I thought. ::adds to an extremely long pitch list::
Reply Retweet Like
Scott Klair Dec 10
1.The issue is addressed via gerrymandering, not directly, for practical reasons. 2.Urban to rural, broadly: NYC to upstate. LA/Oakland to the Inland Empire. Chicago to S. Illinois. Atlanta to S. GA. NOLA to Angola. And so forth.
Reply Retweet Like
🌎 The 🚀 Cosmist 🌌 Insurrection ✊ 🏴 Dec 10
Replying to @JohnFPfaff
Indeed, while both urban & rural districts underwent de-industrialization, this allowed for a subtle form of carceral keynesianism, make work jobs for white rural Americans at the expense of urban poc
Reply Retweet Like