Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Intaction.org
WHO met and decided to chop off African foreskins. The invited Africans were not decision makers but on-lookers as the Global North deliberated over black bodies. Circumcision has a history of...
The African Exponent The African Exponent @africanexponent
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
peter kilmarx 10. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Intaction1 @AmerAcadPeds i 7 ostali
And more, recent, real-world data: Circumcised men in Tanzania had a significantly lower risk of gonorrhoea (48%), HIV (58%) and HPV16 (52%), compared with uncircumcised men.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Intaction.org 10. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PeterKilmarx @AmerAcadPeds i 7 ostali
Fake claims by a genital mutilation fanatic, the stated circumcision had no effect on gonorrhea in 2012 technical report. Same for HPV.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
peter kilmarx 10. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Intaction1 @AmerAcadPeds i 7 ostali
More, recent, "real-world" data: 43% decline in HIV incidence in South Africa from 2012 to 2017. "Men experienced an earlier and larger incidence decline than women, consistent with male circumcision scale-up and higher levels of female ART coverage."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Intaction.org 10. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PeterKilmarx @AmerAcadPeds i 7 ostali
US government is expert at wasting billions on foreign aid programs that accomplish nothing other than enriching politically connected companies and institutions, no matter what damage they inflict.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
peter kilmarx 10. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Intaction1 @AmerAcadPeds i 7 ostali
So, in summary: Research proves circumcision, which has been practiced in Africa for centuries, reduces HIV risk by 60%. WHO consultation recommending circumcision has substantial African representation. Sovereign African nations make their own circumcision policies.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"