Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Sam Finlayson 2. velj
There is one topic that’s always my twitter Achilles heel: stats “vs” ML debates. Their existence frustrates me and I can never help myself. So, a few months back, I promised myself that the next time one came up, instead of entering the scrum, I’d just write a post. So.. 1/3
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sam Finlayson
Here are some thoughts on stats “vs” ML. Rel btwn the fields, why debates on topic are almost always fundamentally flawed, why I think there’s so much talking past each other, and why I wish we could focus instead on *specific* methods + problems 2/3
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Sam Finlayson 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin
To be clear, I’m under no illusion that this post will change anyone’s mind about anything. It was written quickly, and reasonable can disagree with many of my points. Rather, I hope it rids me of desire to waste time on toxic instantiations of this debate in the future. 3/3
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sam Finlayson 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JFutoma
PS Thanks for prompting me to write it, and for commenting on my raw initial thoughts yesterday.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jesse A. Tov 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin @mattmight
This controversy is funny from outside but nearby. As a computer scientist who knows nothing about stats, much less about machines learning*. I would have defined “machine learning” as “applied statistics for AI.” ————— *ML stands for Meta Language.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sam Finlayson 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JesseTheTov @mattmight
Yep, that’s not far off from where I define it. I even compare it to econometrics in this regard.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Norm Matloff 香港人加油!tinyurl.com/y2nxf43a 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin
The only difference is that stat people view the data as a sample from a population while ML people don't. The odd thing, though, is that the MLers speak in sampling terms anyway, when talking about bias/variance and predicting new cases (presumably from the same distribution!).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
George M Samaras 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin
LOL! Very nice, good job. Folks do struggle with cross-disciplinary stuff; silos are so safe ;-))
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fabian Schreiber 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin
This is very well written! Thanks!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Greg Stoddard 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin @jeremyphoward
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dean Eckles 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @IAmSamFin
Agreed on the missing historical context!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"