|
@HockeyInJune | |||||
|
I hate when security folks say "attackers only have to win once, defenders have to win every time" because it's flawed thinking.
Thanks @haroonmeer for this: "Actually, an attacker can win everywhere and as a defender you only have to find them once"
youtu.be/Wqww0BRIX5U
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Aaron Grattafiori
@dyn___
|
28. ruj |
|
💯
|
||
|
|
||
|
418: No Coffee 4 U 🤖
@ramriot
|
28. ruj |
|
But you do have to find them, not just a IP or an addresd but physically lay hands on them & then make sure they are stopped
Otherwise they will be back as someone else in no time
|
||
|
|
||
|
Matthew Hall
@pentestmatt
|
28. ruj |
|
I suppose it depends on what your definition of “win” is. A single compromise might be a “win” which can be detected by blue team within time. Or it could be “I’ve been on your network for years without you noticing and left of my own terms”. Ymmv
|
||
|
|
||
|
D̒͂̕ᵈăᵃn̕ᶰ Ť̾̾̓͐͒͠ᵗe͗̑́̋̂́͡ᵉn̅ᶰtᵗl̀̓͘ᶫe̓̒̂̚ᵉrʳ
@Viss
|
25. sij |
|
"defenders have to defend the whole castle and attackers only have to find one entrypoint to gain access" - true.
but it gets turned on its head soon as the attackers get a shell:
"attackers make ONE MISTAKE, and their entire c2 infra is burned and they have to rebuild"
|
||
|
|
||