Twitter | Search | |
Hilary White
Hey guys... here's something to think about: what if Vatican I was, well, wrong?
Reply Retweet Like More
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
I'm not an expert, so this is a real (not snark) question; was Vat-II supposed to be the completion of V-I?
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
No, I was thinking more about the formulation of infallibility. Some objected that a definition would end up backfiring & I think this is it
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
Got a link?
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
Yes, I've done the reading for this course.
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
Oh, Peter's podcast... yeah. I've been meaning to get to this. I'll pretty much listen to anything Peter has to say.
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 16 Jul 17
V-I doesn't have 1700 years of saints behind it. What was happening exactly then? The bulldozer of Modernia; Freemasonic salting of te earth
Reply Retweet Like
akajoe 16 Jul 17
Yep, infallible popes awfully hard to square with last 50 years of functional dissolution and reversals of doctrine
Reply Retweet Like
Wandile 17 Jul 17
Replying to @Hilarityjane66
It wasn't. This shows a deep misunderstanding of the decree. V1 did not teach a personal infallibility. Popes can err outside of V1 limits
Reply Retweet Like
Hilary White 18 Jul 17
Replying to @Wandi_Star
Newman argued that while correct, it was untimely, would tend to give people the wrong ideas. Would create confusion in fact. & here we are
Reply Retweet Like
🗝Dan 16 Jul 17
Replying to @Hilarityjane66
R&R's final destination is the same as Protestantism: Every man his own arbiter of Truth. Every man his own Pope.
Reply Retweet Like