|
@Grady_Booch | |||||
|
Conor, respectfully, you know very little about von Neumann or the history of computing in which he lived.
and as such I have a difficult time excepting anything else you said in this thread.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Conor White-Sullivan🧢
@Conaw
|
15. pro |
|
100 Opinions on this -- prompted by @vgr
Will have to break for a call any minute, but will do best to free associate in meantime. twitter.com/vgr/status/120…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Conor White-Sullivan🧢
@Conaw
|
15. pro |
|
1. Johnny Von Neumann isn't nearly as deep a genius as people seem to think.
If he was, he wouldn't have said bullshit like this pic.twitter.com/nk1VGN2tS2
|
||
|
|
||
|
misc_activist.jpeg
@nthmost
|
17. pro |
|
Respectfully, you probably don't know how much Von Neumann more or less LIFTED from better engineers and scientists just by hanging around and being first to publish.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Grady Booch
@Grady_Booch
|
17. pro |
|
Respectfully, I'm happy to have a continuing conversation with you if and only if you can tell me if you've researched this domain - and the story of Von Neumann - as much as I have.
Here's what I've read thus far.
computingthehumanexperience.com/books/
|
||
|
|
||
|
Grady Booch
@Grady_Booch
|
17. pro |
|
accepting*
|
||
|
|
||
|
Márcio
@marciojrtorres
|
16. pro |
|
Exactly. You can't judge old events and writings by the nowadays values. This is what historians call "anachronism".
|
||
|
|
||