Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Hillel 27. lis
Whenever people say things like "Programmers shouldn't have to write sequential code if it doesn't matter", I'm like NO WHAT ARE YOU DOING Sequentiality means less concurrency and that's A Good Thing
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Hillel 27. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hillelogram
There's a lot of trend now like "oh concurrency isn't bad if you have the right language", but those only help with specific cases, the general case is still miserable Concurrency → nondeterminism → multiple possible program behaviors → bugs
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
on error resume next
It should be required that they play through the deadlock empire ( ) before any attempt to argue about concurrency.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Hillel 27. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FlorianHeigl1
Oh my god, this is incredible
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
on error resume next 27. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hillelogram
Glad you also loved it... There should be more like it
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Paulo Renato 28. lis
Well but as far as I am aware you have languages, like and , that dont suffer from this deadlock issue, neither they need semaphors. cc
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Hillel 28. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Exadra37 @FlorianHeigl1 @josevalim
Elixir and Erlang can suffer from livelock problems though
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Wes 27. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FlorianHeigl1 @hillelogram
as well is an excellent introduction to the issues concurrency can bring
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Tobias N. Sasse 27. lis
Can we have that for Java please? 😍
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Petr Havlak 28. lis
Wow, didn't know that 😀💪
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Francois Armand 28. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FlorianHeigl1 @hillelogram
wow, this site is a pearl!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"