Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Fiora
brand usage guidelines are way better if you read them as SCP containment procedures
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Fiora 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna
wow this blew up, go read the antimemetics division
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
KaryoKleptid 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna @TetraspaceAdmn
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
KaryoKleptid 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna @TetraspaceAdmn
It keeps going strong
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
aran 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna
A margin of 50% of its width must be left blank around any representation of the logo, to avoid a memetic breach and a potential CK-class scenario.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
czub / ズー 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna
to be fair, brands are cognitohazards
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
🦨 Ren Leaf 🦨 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna @patterfloof
See experiment log A-343-1 Incident "Tweet Thread" and Addendum 343-i2 "Operation: Terms of Service" for further details.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eiyeron 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SknqNine @FioraAeterna @patterfloof
Adjacently, made me think of this one:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
sea shanty stan account ⛵ 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna
Adobe not wanting you to call photoshopping photoshopping is not in fact because it's harming their ability to copyright the word photoshop but because it is a Keter-class infohazard
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
🇪🇺 patter of many paws 🇪🇺 28. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FioraAeterna @digitalfox0
if its not a bird, why does it look exactly like a simplified bird?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
... 28. stu
Same reason Hello Kitty looks like a cat
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"