Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Filippo Valsorda
Kathryn, , did not bypass code review. She didn't disrupt anyone's work. She didn't target an individual. She didn't violate any policy I'm aware of. She linked to an NLRB notice from an extension that exists to show links to policies. This only makes sense as retaliation.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Filippo Valsorda 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eiais
Here's the NLRB notice that Google was required to post. Kathryn linked to it from an extension that specifically exists to notify Googlers of policies relevant to the websites they are visiting.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mikhail Sirotenko 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FiloSottile @eiais
I make a change in Chrome code to show you a pop-up notification about a global warming when you're on a certain site. I somehow get OWNERS approval. Formally I'm not violating any rules and also kind of doing a good thing. But wouldn't you call it abuse of power?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Filippo Valsorda 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @sirotenko_m @eiais
That's such a strawman, come on. This was an internal only extension that exists to show policy popups, and it interacts with meaningful questions of concerted activity. It has nothing to do with modifying a customer-facing product.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fay 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FiloSottile @eiais
Thanks, this is important context. Stories everywhere from "she just shared info with other employees about organizing" to "she stealth-added a popup window with pro-union info whenever employees visit certain pages". This seems like a case where the details are important!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @davidpfay @FiloSottile @eiais
It's not "pro-union" info, it's a neutral notice written by the NLRB that Google was already required to disseminate.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Christopher Thatcher 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FiloSottile @eiais
Do you know if she used an "emergency Rapid deploy" as Royal suggested? I'm new enough to not know how to look that up. Smells like garbage retaliation to me.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Anna, Forgiven Exhaustion 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @OtherDentist @FiloSottile @eiais
Xoogler here. Worth noting that Rapid is just the name of a build/deploy tool, and afaict any release that isn't fully automated is part of the "emergency" workflow in this context.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Shodan 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FiloSottile @eiais
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Lucio Martelli 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FiloSottile @whitequark @eiais
If you are a nuisance to the workflow, for example by being overtly political on controversial topics during working hours, it is absolutely reasonable that management kicks you in the ass as you are paid to be useful to the company (at their arbitrary discretion), nothing else
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
whitequark 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @LucioMM1
thanks for demonstrating your inability to read
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"