|
@FateOfTwist_ | |||||
|
Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
|
||
|
David Chapman
@Meaningness
|
2. kol |
|
“The absence of thought with the presence of awareness” seems relatively unproblematic. (Although the possibility if rhat is denied by some major philosophers.) Nb I don’t particularly advocate that definition, just noting it as reasonably inoffensive metaphysically
|
||
|
|
||
|
David Chapman
@Meaningness
|
2. kol |
|
“of that”, typo
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jennifer RM
@almostlikethat
|
2. kol |
|
One hypothesis I have (for at least some accounts) is that it means one's "audio/phonological loop of the ~3 second auditory now" has no imaginary content in it. No speech rehearsal. No tulpa whispers. No musical earworms.
JUST representations of environmental air vibrations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
What even is a "representation of environmental air vibrations"?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Object Of Objects
@ObjectOfObjects
|
2. kol |
|
Takuan Souhou? Not sure, it's been a while.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Mark (🧘🧪🧙♂️💩❤️)
@meditationstuff
|
2. kol |
|
|
||