|
@DavidCamposSF | |||||
|
Status quo not working for Mission. Pause on LUXURY housing will allow time for City to develop plan for building affordable housing needed!
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Jason McDaniel
@ValisJason
|
5 de mai |
|
@DavidCamposSF You're saying city simply doesn't have capacity to do two things at same time?? Confusing.
|
||
|
||
|
|
Jason McDaniel
@ValisJason
|
5 de mai |
|
@DavidCamposSF Status quo for over 25 years has been to make it difficult to build. That's why prices are high.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Mike Gaeta
@MaestroGaeta
|
5 de mai |
|
@ptraughber @DavidCamposSF And booms don't ever turn to bust and rising tide raises all boats, blah blah blah. Real prob is Campos isn't
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mike Gaeta
@MaestroGaeta
|
5 de mai |
|
@ptraughber @DavidCamposSF progressive enough. Where's Matt Gonzalez when you need him?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Patrick Traughber
@ptraughber
|
5 de mai |
|
@maestrogaeta @davidcampossf what would "progressive enough" look like with respect to housing?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mike Gaeta
@MaestroGaeta
|
5 de mai |
|
@ptraughber SF Green Party website has some good ideas. Makes the point that progressives are retreating too much.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Patrick Traughber
@ptraughber
|
5 de mai |
|
@maestrogaeta have a link to those good ideas?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Brian Hanlon
@hanlonbt
|
5 de mai |
|
@DavidCamposSF Is your plan to let rich people buy existing homes instead of building new homes for them, thus increasing displacement?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ken Archer
@kenarchersf
|
5 de mai |
|
@DavidCamposSF why not use the moratorium as an incentive to pass broader package that streamlines bldg approvals?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Ken Archer
@kenarchersf
|
5 de mai |
|
@DavidCamposSF is your theory that this moratorium will mean fewer new residents? Or that they'll just live somewhere else in SF?
|
||
|
|
||