|
@DKeithClimate | |||||
|
2/3 It would be very interesting to use same Q's in North America and Europe. My guess (based on some data) is that attitudes would be more negative.
Is this that people who feel impacts more are inclined to view SRM more favorably? See Dannenberg: nature.com/articles/s4155…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
David Keith
@DKeithClimate
|
11. sij |
|
1/3 Interesting new paper from Masa Sugiyama on SE-Asian view of solar geoengineering.
Clever to follow Bostrom and use college students ensures similar education and samples and age that matters.
doi.org/10.1080/175240… pic.twitter.com/mPWJY5N4Zi
|
||
|
||
|
|
David Keith
@DKeithClimate
|
11. sij |
|
3/3 A big Q is how much overall views depend on how the survey instrument presented/described SRM. I would love to see this repeated with several different survey instruments that had divergent spin's on SRM to see how much that shapes result.
|
||
|
|
||