Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
David Keith
Thanks! in "How much bulk energy storage is needed to decarbonize electricity?" we find (a) that bats are *long* way from being cost effective for deep decarb of electricity, and (b) there are other ways to to very low carbon intensity.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Geoengineering Info 1. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DKeithClimate
Batteries make no sense for long term storage. P2X
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Freedom_Redeemer 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DKeithClimate
Concrete production and cargo ships emit more carbon than any motor vehicle or coal fired power plant COMBINED!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Freedom_Redeemer 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DKeithClimate
Underappreciated? How about UNAPPRECIATED?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
kangwa Mandona 18. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DKeithClimate
hi professor my name is kangwa,I would like to discuss with you something on reducing both D.A.C and A.2.F™ synthesis cost reduction through free($0/mwh) low ,emissions (~31.5 KgCo2/Mwh)electricity, my email is manndonakangwa@gmail.com
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"