|
@CrimeADay | |||||
|
42 USC §§264, 271 & 42 CFR §71.33(c)(1) make it a federal crime for a person coming to the United States, who is considered to pose an exceptionally serious risk of transmitting a communicable disease, to not submit to medical surveillance and monitoring.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Khanan Abayev
@KhananAbayev
|
31. sij |
|
Wait a second, so those 195 people on that flight - if they didn't agree to cooperate, they'd have broken a federal law? How is "serious" defined?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Max
@UnsettlingStory
|
31. sij |
|
Topical storm A Crime a Day!
|
||
|
|
||
|
not worthmentioning
@OmahaVike
|
31. sij |
|
That's racist!!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Me, Myself and Irony©®™
@bubbz_daddy_jim
|
31. sij |
|
cc: Melania and Ivana
|
||
|
|
||
|
gbnf
@Gbnf4life
|
31. sij |
|
you don't have to be so topical
|
||
|
|
||
|
LindaTenhat
@TenhatLB
|
31. sij |
|
I've noticed that A Crime A Day usually posts laws that are relevant to news o' the day📰📺🖥️.
|
||
|
|
||
|
LindaTenhat
@TenhatLB
|
31. sij |
|
I guess it's a good thing there's already a law for that, because absolutely nothing is getting done in Congress these days.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bardas Phocas
@BardasPhocas
|
31. sij |
|
|
||
|
Zane
@ScholarErrant
|
31. sij |
|
Does the statute define “exceptionally serious risk” or is that delegated to the executive, likely to be determined on a case-by-case basis?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hire a Veteran
@tweet_b_r_o
|
31. sij |
|
Why are there laws to protect what should be considered the natural and correct thing to do?
|
||
|
|
||
|
LEAVEMEALONE!
@scottnbarbi
|
31. sij |
|
Because everyone is as pure as you.
|
||
|
|
||