Twitter | Search | |
Katie Mack Jan 24
Stating scientific facts about the atmosphere of our planet is not and must not be "politics." Reality should not be a political stance.
Reply Retweet Like
Katie Mack
If someone's political stance requires preventing scientists from informing you about your own planet, that's not politics, it's oppression.
Reply Retweet Like More
Michael Woods Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
at some point, someone brings a suit which alleges manslaughter as a result of climate change denial
Reply Retweet Like
♄ Archmonad of Saturn ♄ Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
"Don't disturb my circles" should become a war cry
Reply Retweet Like
Dr. Julie Gurner Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
Yes - facts/truth should guide your beliefs...not politics.
Reply Retweet Like
kelly palicki Jan 24
Our former Prime Minister, (Canada), did the same shit. Put gag orders on scientific researchers and cut funding.
Reply Retweet Like
The Tom Whyte Jan 24
Ah, those government funded politically correct grant junky impractical people whose livelihoods depend on churning out scare stories.
Reply Retweet Like
Gemma Cooper Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
@xL_JoeI YES
Reply Retweet Like
Gemma Cooper Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
@xL_JoeI as Geographer, nothing upsets me more than someone taking our study and evidence and ignoring it.
Reply Retweet Like
Katie Mack Jan 24
Replying to @Woodsy1069
I've been wondering when it gets classified as a crime against humanity
Reply Retweet Like
Sara G Jan 24
so um, what do we do about this one
Reply Retweet Like
Katie Mack Jan 24
My suggestion was that people (eg you) scientists are prevented from speaking to are oppressed. Enforced ignorance.
Reply Retweet Like
Casper Hulshof Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie @NadineBoke
"...reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Reply Retweet Like
Nadine Boke Jan 24
Replying to @CasperHuls @AstroKatie
. Maybe we should start setting up proxy accounts for US scientific institutions -> they send content anonymously,
Reply Retweet Like
Nadine Boke Jan 24
Replying to @CasperHuls @AstroKatie
. ..and we publish it using Twitter accounts the US government can't control.
Reply Retweet Like
michaela Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
"freedom of speech" "freedom of the press" doesn't this all break the First Amendment?? How's it even possible
Reply Retweet Like
Alex Moothart Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie
YES!!!
Reply Retweet Like
❄️One Merry Magoo ❄️ Jan 24
Replying to @AstroKatie @Woodsy1069
I see it as a total liability. Absolutely! A potentially dangerous liability for you and me.
Reply Retweet Like
❄️One Merry Magoo ❄️ Jan 24
Muting our and the is gross negligence.
Reply Retweet Like