Twitter | Search | |
Adam Clark
Serious football fan. Editor at , artist and writer.
22,687
Tweets
349
Following
343
Followers
Tweets
Adam Clark 4h
Hmm. Gee I wonder why people no longer take the Heisman award seriously anymore.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
All I've ever asked. I have to go but I appreciate your willingness to keep an open mind.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
I'm positive if you dug deeply into this OAG investigation you'd be dismayed by how terrible it was. You may not conclude innocence but you'd definitely see this case as a clusterfuck & not be quite sure what to believe.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Even if I 100% believed Sandusky was guilty after going through the legal debacle that was the OAG's investigation I'd have to deem the case too tampered with to convict. So many leaks & witness tampering it's ridiculous.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Nope. Department of Welfare sent an investigator/psychologist to look into it. He said there wasn't indication of CSA so the DA dropped it. Usually unless DPW or child services indicates CSA a DA won't pursue.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
I've showered in communal showers (YMCA, swimming pool) with my dad. Tori Spelling's family talked about showering with their kids.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Especially when you realize at the time the scandal exploded there were just 6 known accusers one of which had his case investigated in 1998 & dismissed.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
The showers were communal showers like you'd see at the YMCA. Sandusky admitted his gestures of fatherly affection (hugs, hand on leg) may've been a crossed boundary.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Evidence that men and women are different psychologically? That's pretty self evident.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
It's virtually impossible to prove innocence in a their word vs his case. But the standard for not guilty I believe is met.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
There was no direct evidence of abuse other than testimony. Integrity of said testimony was compromised by investigators sharing info with witnesses. Each accuser changed their story & stood to get rich doing so.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Am I going to find out this is a study of adult women raped by men and not men who were raped as boys?
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
Link please.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 7h
All this argues is that victims often don't report sexual assaults, it doesn't argue your point.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
That's not lying about not being abused and it doesn't mention blaming themselves either.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
Jim Clemente. He claimed 70% of male CSA victims are abused by a 2nd abuser later. Closest I found was a study showing 1/3 of men who were sexually assaulted (often by peers) were assaulted later too.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
Once again at the time they were kept totally anonymous. This is just a screen shot. Cite actual data from an actual study.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
Most people will cite Ken Lanning's Child Molesters: A behavioural Analysis. This book only covers contemporaneous child victims/witnesses.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
I've actually caught a renowned expert making up statistics. A lot of them base things on personal experience which may not always be scientifically correct.
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Clark 8h
Please cite this. Most experts are referring to children testifying and how they behave. There's never been any real data in regards to adults that I'm aware of.
Reply Retweet Like